Posted on

An IRS watchdog report has debunked claims in the liberal media that former President Donald Trump ordered audits of the tax returns of former FBI chiefs James Comey and Andrew McCabe because they were critical of him and his administration.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) found that the IRS randomly selected Mr. Comey and Mr. McCabe for audits of their tax returns from 2017 and 2019, along with thousands of others, as part of an IRS system known as the National Research Program.

The New York Times reported last July that Mr. Comey and Mr. McCabe were subjected to “intensive” audits of their returns and that the scrutiny was likely no coincidence.

“The minuscule chances of the two highest-ranking F.B.I. officials — who made some of the most politically consequential law enforcement decisions in a generation — being randomly subjected to a detailed scrub of their tax returns a few years after leaving their posts presents extraordinary questions,” Times correspondent Michael Schmidt wrote at the time.

According to the inspector general’s report, Mr. Comey’s 2017 tax return and Mr. McCabe’s 2019 tax return were selected under the National Research Program during the tenure of IRS Commissioner Charles P. Rettig, a Trump appointee whose term ended last month.

The watchdog found no proof of wrongdoing by Mr. Trump or any Trump-appointed officials.

“Although we did not identify misconduct during our review, TIGTA is taking additional steps to assess the process used to select the seed numbers [in the audit program],” the report said.

The Times’ report, and other coverage by MSNBC and CNN, encouraged a narrative that Mr. Trump sought political payback on the former FBI chiefs for opening an investigation into his presidential campaign in 2016.

Mr. Trump would fire Mr. Comey in May 2017, and then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired Mr. McCabe in March 2018, just before his scheduled retirement from the bureau.

Mr. Rettig, whose term began eight months after the IRS began selecting returns for the 2017 audit, told investigators “that he had no conversations with the current or prior presidential administration relative to” the audit selection program.

“Commissioner further stated that he was not involved in any of the sample selections or in directly or indirectly influencing who would be selected,” the report said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *